Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 16, 2017 13:51:27 GMT -4
hi tim have another poll
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 16, 2017 13:53:23 GMT -4
 like a boss no one says that never mind |
|
|
|
Post by Duck14 on Apr 18, 2017 10:05:39 GMT -4
Sigh, no Cyan.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pruz on Apr 18, 2017 11:08:50 GMT -4
I feel you. I was going to choose Cyan if there was one, but I chose a similar color. I think I'm fed up with Cyan now?
|
|
|
|
Post by Death on Apr 18, 2017 12:16:30 GMT -4
Well, we all know what I, as a northern Irish person will vote for.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tikobe on Apr 18, 2017 19:01:46 GMT -4
It's sad there was no brown. I would've chosen brown.
|
|
|
|
Post by LeBlunder on Apr 18, 2017 20:47:01 GMT -4
Where's Asian yellow?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2017 15:29:49 GMT -4
You really have to start limiting the number of options people can pick
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2017 16:10:50 GMT -4
You really have to start limiting the number of options people can pick I only do that when it matters |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2017 16:42:44 GMT -4
You really have to start limiting the number of options people can pick I only do that when it matters But how can I get an accurate representation of how many people like blood red? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2017 18:29:40 GMT -4
I only do that when it matters But how can I get an accurate representation of how many people like blood red? Arguably, you get a better representation with unlimited choices than you would with one-vote-per-person. If votes were limited, people would have to choose which one they liked absolute best, while with unlimited voting people can vote for whichever ones they like without having to exclude any. If you'd like a more accurate representation of how many people considered blood red their singlemost favorite out of all these given colors, then it would be better to have a one-vote-per-person poll. However, as you just wanted to know how many people like it, regardless of whether it's in their top three or even top ten picks, then the way the poll is now already gives the most accurate representation a poll in a little community like this can provide. |
|
|
|
Post by Bannanachair on Apr 19, 2017 20:04:11 GMT -4
But how can I get an accurate representation of how many people like blood red? Arguably, you get a better representation with unlimited choices than you would with one-vote-per-person. If votes were limited, people would have to choose which one they liked absolute best, while with unlimited voting people can vote for whichever ones they like without having to exclude any. If you'd like a more accurate representation of how many people considered blood red their singlemost favorite out of all these given colors, then it would be better to have a one-vote-per-person poll. However, as you just wanted to know how many people like it, regardless of whether it's in their top three or even top ten picks, then the way the poll is now already gives the most accurate representation a poll in a little community like this can provide. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2017 20:15:28 GMT -4
why a video
good video
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2017 21:34:55 GMT -4
But how can I get an accurate representation of how many people like blood red? Arguably, you get a better representation with unlimited choices than you would with one-vote-per-person. If votes were limited, people would have to choose which one they liked absolute best, while with unlimited voting people can vote for whichever ones they like without having to exclude any. If you'd like a more accurate representation of how many people considered blood red their singlemost favorite out of all these given colors, then it would be better to have a one-vote-per-person poll. However, as you just wanted to know how many people like it, regardless of whether it's in their top three or even top ten picks, then the way the poll is now already gives the most accurate representation a poll in a little community like this can provide. Please, it was a joke. Calm down. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2017 21:50:53 GMT -4
can you stop saying "calm down"
i have no wish to argue over whether or not i was calm when i typed that, but if you really must know, i was not upset in the least bit when typing that, and thus had nothing to calm down from.
i would also like to add that there is a different kind of humor which involves replying seriously to a joke. it is a much more subtle form of humor, and often is not understood, as it has no punchline, no pun-chline, and overall no easily recognizable humorous qualities.
since it is more subtle, it is also a safer form of humor; no one gets upset at you for not taking what they said seriously, in the case of a misunderstanding, and though people may bash at you for not being able to "take a joke", i personally would prefer that chance as opposed to accidentally making fun of a serious comment.
postscript
the subtle humor is sort of a sarcastic humor, but not just that; it's a little hard to explain. it has the power to take a meaningless joke into an actually intelligent and arguably more worthwhile conversation. so, i guess it's not just a subtle humor, but a bridge from trivial to logical.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2017 21:53:10 GMT -4
that said, if you want an entire essay on why telling people to "calm down" is generally un- or even counterproductive, i can do so, but it will take a while- probably at least a day- especially considering i have many things to do that are arguably more immediately important than writing about minimizing conflict.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 19, 2017 22:07:50 GMT -4
that said, if you want an entire essay on why telling people to "calm down" is generally un- or even counterproductive, i can do so, but it will take a while- probably at least a day- especially considering i have many things to do that are arguably more immediately important than writing about minimizing conflict. Please, no more essays. I just genuinely don't care |
|
|
|
Post by Tikobe on Apr 19, 2017 23:46:47 GMT -4
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 20, 2017 3:14:30 GMT -4
can you stop saying "calm down" i have no wish to argue over whether or not i was calm when i typed that, but if you really must know, i was not upset in the least bit when typing that, and thus had nothing to calm down from. i would also like to add that there is a different kind of humor which involves replying seriously to a joke. it is a much more subtle form of humor, and often is not understood, as it has no punchline, no pun-chline, and overall no easily recognizable humorous qualities. since it is more subtle, it is also a safer form of humor; no one gets upset at you for not taking what they said seriously, in the case of a misunderstanding, and though people may bash at you for not being able to "take a joke", i personally would prefer that chance as opposed to accidentally making fun of a serious comment. postscript the subtle humor is sort of a sarcastic humor, but not just that; it's a little hard to explain. it has the power to take a meaningless joke into an actually intelligent and arguably more worthwhile conversation. so, i guess it's not just a subtle humor, but a bridge from trivial to logical. No matter how you explain it or attempt to justify it, a "joke" of this sort still has you coming off as a massive asshole |
|
|
|
Post by Death on Apr 20, 2017 4:41:53 GMT -4
can you stop saying "calm down" i have no wish to argue over whether or not i was calm when i typed that, but if you really must know, i was not upset in the least bit when typing that, and thus had nothing to calm down from. i would also like to add that there is a different kind of humor which involves replying seriously to a joke. it is a much more subtle form of humor, and often is not understood, as it has no punchline, no pun-chline, and overall no easily recognizable humorous qualities. since it is more subtle, it is also a safer form of humor; no one gets upset at you for not taking what they said seriously, in the case of a misunderstanding, and though people may bash at you for not being able to "take a joke", i personally would prefer that chance as opposed to accidentally making fun of a serious comment. postscript the subtle humor is sort of a sarcastic humor, but not just that; it's a little hard to explain. it has the power to take a meaningless joke into an actually intelligent and arguably more worthwhile conversation. so, i guess it's not just a subtle humor, but a bridge from trivial to logical. No matter how you explain it or attempt to justify it, a "joke" of this sort still has you coming off as a massive asshole This conversation is going to evolve from a civilised affair to an argument very soon- I don't want you guys fighting so I ask you please restrain yourselves. Also, Purring, we all have humerus qualities, because we have skeletons below this fleshy cage we call skin. |
|
|
|
Post by Bannanachair on Apr 20, 2017 5:34:49 GMT -4
No matter how you explain it or attempt to justify it, a "joke" of this sort still has you coming off as a massive asshole This conversation is going to evolve from a civilised affair to an argument very soon- I don't want you guys fighting so I ask you please restrain yourselves. Also, Purring, we all have humerus qualities, because we have skeletons below this fleshy cage we call skin. This argument is clearly not about voting systems. If you guys are angry about something and need to to relieve stress just yell at me. |
|
|
|
Post by Death on Apr 20, 2017 5:51:44 GMT -4
This conversation is going to evolve from a civilised affair to an argument very soon- I don't want you guys fighting so I ask you please restrain yourselves. Also, Purring, we all have humerus qualities, because we have skeletons below this fleshy cage we call skin. This argument is clearly not about voting systems. If you guys are angry about something and need to to relieve stress just yell at me. But I don't have a bone to pick with you, Tim-tam. |
|
|
|
Post by Bannanachair on Apr 20, 2017 7:26:58 GMT -4
This argument is clearly not about voting systems. If you guys are angry about something and need to to relieve stress just yell at me. But I don't have a bone to pick with you, Tim-tam. I wasn't addressing you; I was adding to your point. |
|
|
|
Post by Death on Apr 20, 2017 8:41:44 GMT -4
But I don't have a bone to pick with you, Tim-tam. I wasn't addressing you; I was adding to your point. I was just ribbing you on Tim. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 20, 2017 10:10:47 GMT -4
No matter how you explain it or attempt to justify it, a "joke" of this sort still has you coming off as a massive asshole This conversation is going to evolve from a civilised affair to an argument very soon- I don't want you guys fighting so I ask you please restrain yourselves. Also, Purring, we all have humerus qualities, because we have skeletons below this fleshy cage we call skin. It wasn't a good idea to say anything anyway My apologies |
|
