|
|
Post by Bannanachair on Jul 1, 2015 22:32:13 GMT -4
Title. Debate below.
|
|
|
|
Post by eloos on Jul 1, 2015 22:39:58 GMT -4
obviously
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2015 22:44:37 GMT -4
the dong isnt touching another dong so um
|
|
Danonymous
2K Club
System.out.println("Hello Bannanachair!");
Posts: 2,086 
|
Post by Danonymous on Jul 1, 2015 23:11:13 GMT -4
He's just a corpse of an old man with multiple limbs stretching, nothing gross with that except for the exposed donger.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eternity on Jul 1, 2015 23:14:06 GMT -4
Nudity =/= Pornography
I would say more, but I'm bad at words.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bannanachair on Jul 1, 2015 23:15:40 GMT -4
Is nobody going to argue the other side here?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2015 23:17:14 GMT -4
Nudity aint Porno.
But then again, I got banned for dick fingers.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eternity on Jul 1, 2015 23:18:43 GMT -4
Is nobody going to argue the other side here? No, because there is no other side. Even if it does involve nudity, it's nudity used in the scientific and artistic aspects. |
|
|
|
Post by Bannanachair on Jul 1, 2015 23:21:40 GMT -4
Is nobody going to argue the other side here? No, because there is no other side. Even if it does involve nudity, it's nudity used in the scientific and artistic aspects. You could define pornography as anything that arouses, and say that any nudity, be it for scientific purposes or if the subject is not in a sexual position at all, has the potential to arouse certain individuals. You can therefore call it nudity. Alternately, you could draw attention to his spread legs. |
|
|
|
Post by eloos on Jul 1, 2015 23:22:31 GMT -4
who gets aroused by the vitruvian man
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 1, 2015 23:27:02 GMT -4
Weirdos.
I've looked at like, porn from the 1800's and it's like, boner killing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eternity on Jul 1, 2015 23:29:15 GMT -4
No, because there is no other side. Even if it does involve nudity, it's nudity used in the scientific and artistic aspects. You could define pornography as anything that arouses, and say that any nudity, be it for scientific purposes or if the subject is not in a sexual position at all, has the potential to arouse certain individuals. You can therefore call it nudity. Alternately, you could draw attention to his spread legs. People can be aroused by literally anything. It's called fetish. It's pretty damn gross and can turn even the most innocent thing into pornography. On another note, the spread legs are not spread to arouse anybody, but instead to help demonstrate the human form, which was the original purpose of the vitruvian man. A clothed body looks nothing like a nude body, so having the man be clothed would take away from the scientific aspect. It's not pornography, it's a study of the human body. If people are aroused by it, THEY can consider it porn. By definition, however, the vitruvian man is in no way pornographic. |
|
|
|
Post by eloos on Jul 1, 2015 23:38:44 GMT -4
^what was the point of that
|
|
|
|
Post by eloos on Jul 1, 2015 23:42:20 GMT -4
refer to steam chat
|
|
|
|
Post by The Jiggler on Jul 1, 2015 23:56:33 GMT -4
|
|
