|
|
Post by Bannanachair on Sept 6, 2016 10:14:49 GMT -4
Just curious. I included Johnson and Stein because lots of people seem to dislike both Clinton and Trump this year so I'm expecting whoever'll win this year to win by a plurality and not a majority. I'm also not including Bernie, O'Malley, Cruz, Rubio, etc. because they lost in the primaries and dropped out of the presidential race and are not running as independents. I only included two third-parties because pretty much nobody has ever heard of the others.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2016 11:21:48 GMT -4
To be perfectly honest, I just wouldn't vote this year
I can't vote for any of the candidates and feel good about it afterward
They're all shit in some way or another
|
|
|
|
Post by Bannanachair on Sept 6, 2016 12:42:25 GMT -4
I wanted O'Malley to win, to be honest.
O'Malley 2024, anyone? Whoever wins 2016 is likely to go for a second term so O'Malley 2020 is unlikely.
|
|
|
|
Post by LNG257 on Sept 6, 2016 15:48:50 GMT -4
I don't think I've heard of Stein, but the other three names I recognize.
|
|
|
|
Post by eloos on Sept 6, 2016 15:50:58 GMT -4
trump has a big mouth and hillarys annoying
idk anything about the other candidates because there's a two party system for whatever fucking reason, there probably is a legit reason but i doubt it
so i likely wouldn't vote
|
|
|
|
Post by Eternity on Sept 6, 2016 16:23:18 GMT -4
imgur.com/gallery/n1VdVHere's a list of the candidates and their views on most things, just in case you don't know much about their political stances. It was a pretty interesting read.
|
|
|
|
Post by eloos on Sept 6, 2016 16:27:43 GMT -4
well from my 13 year old shitty opinions i probably most agree with jill stein but some of her shit is bullshit
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2016 16:39:32 GMT -4
I wanted O'Malley to win, to be honest. O'Malley 2024, anyone? Whoever wins 2016 is likely to go for a second term so O'Malley 2020 is unlikely. Don't know much of O'Malley, so I couldn't say Personally would have liked a Kasich ticket. He's done right by Ohio, but I'm obviously a bit biased He would have been mauled in the general though |
|
|
|
Post by God Bebi Satan on Sept 6, 2016 16:45:29 GMT -4
hillary is a lying shit who's just an out of touch conservative with a grimy poorly done coat of urban paint.
Donald Trump is a relatively evil if benevolent ruler who hearkens back to my main man Reagan.
I pick Trump.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bannanachair on Sept 6, 2016 19:07:32 GMT -4
So far that's three for Clinton, two for Trump and... Oh my, who's voting Green party?
|
|
|
|
Post by LNG257 on Sept 6, 2016 19:29:21 GMT -4
Trump says yes to anything not related to racism/sexism/religionism? Amazing.
Gary looks OK on paper, but I watched a TV show that had an episode focusing on him, and many of his key ideas I disagree with.
Jill Stein looks very good. There are some things she says I don't agree with, and there are some things Hillary says I don't agree with. Either of them would be fine, therefore.
If the general election goes to Trump, I say we choose the greater evil and sacrifice america to Cthulhu.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bannanachair on Sept 6, 2016 20:21:08 GMT -4
Trump says yes to anything not related to racism/sexism/religionism? Amazing. Gary looks OK on paper, but I watched a TV show that had an episode focusing on him, and many of his key ideas I disagree with. Jill Stein looks very good. There are some things she says I don't agree with, and there are some things Hillary says I don't agree with. Either of them would be fine, therefore. If the general election goes to Trump, I say we choose the greater evil and sacrifice america to Cthulhu. *Lesser evil. |
|
|
|
Post by LNG257 on Sept 6, 2016 20:54:39 GMT -4
Trump says yes to anything not related to racism/sexism/religionism? Amazing. Gary looks OK on paper, but I watched a TV show that had an episode focusing on him, and many of his key ideas I disagree with. Jill Stein looks very good. There are some things she says I don't agree with, and there are some things Hillary says I don't agree with. Either of them would be fine, therefore. If the general election goes to Trump, I say we choose the greater evil and sacrifice america to Cthulhu. *Lesser evil. No, greater evil. Cthulhu is always the greatest evil. But is still a better alternative to Trump. |
|
|
|
Post by Duck14 on Sept 6, 2016 21:53:07 GMT -4
Well even if I were old enough I would not be able to vote in an American election.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pawzkat on Sept 6, 2016 22:11:47 GMT -4
I voted. Personally, I don't support either Donald Trump or Hilary (Kinda likin' Jill), but at the same I recognize that she probably isn't going to get the vote.
If the general election goes to Trump, I say we choose the greater evil and sacrifice america to Cthulhu. [x2]
I read through that Imgur thing though - really interesting read, might send it to my dad.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2016 22:18:45 GMT -4
i like how it goes 4 3 2 1
|
|
|
|
Post by Xenos on Sept 6, 2016 22:21:04 GMT -4
you get a cookie
not going to actually buy one but just imagine you got one
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2016 22:32:57 GMT -4
>now it's 4 3 1 2
WHO DID THAT
|
|
|
|
Post by LeBlunder on Sept 6, 2016 22:46:48 GMT -4
*sweats*
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 6, 2016 22:46:55 GMT -4
Trump says yes to anything not related to racism/sexism/religionism? Amazing. Gary looks OK on paper, but I watched a TV show that had an episode focusing on him, and many of his key ideas I disagree with. Jill Stein looks very good. There are some things she says I don't agree with, and there are some things Hillary says I don't agree with. Either of them would be fine, therefore. If the general election goes to Trump, I say we choose the greater evil and sacrifice america to Cthulhu. I'm a centrist libertarian myself, so you'd think my vote would go to Johnson But he actively supports the TPP and net neutrality, and I refuse to support anyone who is an agreence with either of those two things |
|
|
|
Post by Bannanachair on Sept 7, 2016 4:23:47 GMT -4
Trump says yes to anything not related to racism/sexism/religionism? Amazing. Gary looks OK on paper, but I watched a TV show that had an episode focusing on him, and many of his key ideas I disagree with. Jill Stein looks very good. There are some things she says I don't agree with, and there are some things Hillary says I don't agree with. Either of them would be fine, therefore. If the general election goes to Trump, I say we choose the greater evil and sacrifice america to Cthulhu. I'm a centrist libertarian myself, so you'd think my vote would go to Johnson But he actively supports the TPP and net neutrality, and I refuse to support anyone who is an agreence with either of those two things Both the TPP and net neutrality fit in very nicely with Ayn Rand's worldview; you might want to rethink your political philosophy if you're against those two things. |
|
|
|
Post by Pawzkat on Sept 7, 2016 8:07:22 GMT -4
 It's okay Purring, I've gotcha. |
|
|
|
Post by The Villa Strangiato on Sept 7, 2016 8:42:34 GMT -4
hillary clinton is a greedy scumbag that rigged an election with her pals in the dnc
donald trump is a friggin neo facist
gary johnson isn't really great but he does support a few things i support
jill stein is topkek but there's tiny things i don't agree with
we can have 8 brands of coke but only two major parties
both trump and clinton are doing garbage in the polls at 40%
don't you think maybe we should have more of a choice?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 7, 2016 12:29:36 GMT -4
I'm a centrist libertarian myself, so you'd think my vote would go to Johnson But he actively supports the TPP and net neutrality, and I refuse to support anyone who is an agreence with either of those two things Both the TPP and net neutrality fit in very nicely with Ayn Rand's worldview; you might want to rethink your political philosophy if you're against those two things. In the case of the latter, not supporting net neutrality is not supporting the government coming in and mucking up the internet. A.k.a keeping the government out of what they shouldn't be in, a pretty key libertarian principle . In terms of the TPP, I don't particularly care what side of political spectrum not supporting it falls on, but anything that gives corporations more power than governments is just asking for trouble. |
|
|
|
Post by hygenisthygenist on Sept 7, 2016 18:12:07 GMT -4
Both the TPP and net neutrality fit in very nicely with Ayn Rand's worldview; you might want to rethink your political philosophy if you're against those two things. In the case of the latter, not supporting net neutrality is not supporting the government coming in and mucking up the internet. A.k.a keeping the government out of what they shouldn't be in, a pretty key libertarian principle . In terms of the TPP, I don't particularly care what side of political spectrum not supporting it falls on, but anything that gives corporations more power than governments is just asking for trouble. Net neutrality: "net neu·tral·i·ty noun the principle that Internet service providers should enable access to all content and applications regardless of the source, and without favoring or blocking particular products or websites." You bet I support the hell out of that. And I'd rather not let the corps fuck with it, thanks. |
|
