|
Post by Happy on Sept 20, 2016 22:07:11 GMT -4
just leaving this here You are taking this way too far.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 20, 2016 22:09:45 GMT -4
just leaving this here You are taking this way too far. I was bored and wanted to edit a picture I drew during class that had been inspired by a comment of yours. I put it here because you can't post pictures in a shoutbox and the image was actually so large that imgur couldn't upload it lmao
|
|
|
Post by Happy on Sept 20, 2016 22:11:01 GMT -4
You are taking this way too far. I was bored and wanted to edit a picture I drew during class that had been inspired by a comment of yours. I put it here because you can't post pictures in a shoutbox and the image was actually so large that imgur couldn't upload it lmao I have learnt that when something gains so much attention that you draw it, that could mean it's serious. but idk i'm probably just assuming
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 20, 2016 22:22:19 GMT -4
I was bored and wanted to edit a picture I drew during class that had been inspired by a comment of yours. I put it here because you can't post pictures in a shoutbox and the image was actually so large that imgur couldn't upload it lmao I have learnt that when something gains so much attention that you draw it, that could mean it's serious. but idk i'm probably just assuming Actually it just means I thought about it at least enough to draw it. Your overall assumption is pretty easy to disprove; all you need is one counterexample to disprove a claim, and i have tons of counterexamples here's one: (sorry @lng it's the best example i saw within the first few pages of my stuff) now tell me happy do you think the above picture is serious? i did draw it, after all; according to your logic, it may be serious
|
|
|
Post by Happy on Sept 20, 2016 22:26:18 GMT -4
I have learnt that when something gains so much attention that you draw it, that could mean it's serious. but idk i'm probably just assuming Actually it just means I thought about it at least enough to draw it. Your overall assumption is pretty easy to disprove; all you need is one counterexample to disprove a claim, and i have tons of counterexamples here's one: (sorry @lng it's the best example i saw within the first few pages of my stuff) now tell me happy do you think the above picture is serious? i did draw it, after all; according to your logic, it may be serious according to my logic, that's...lng...and a...b-box....
|
|
|
Post by Τι κοιτάς ρε on Sept 20, 2016 22:28:20 GMT -4
just leaving this here It used to be a good drawing. Now it's a great one.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 20, 2016 22:28:40 GMT -4
Actually it just means I thought about it at least enough to draw it. Your overall assumption is pretty easy to disprove; all you need is one counterexample to disprove a claim, and i have tons of counterexamples here's one: (sorry @lng it's the best example i saw within the first few pages of my stuff) now tell me happy do you think the above picture is serious? i did draw it, after all; according to your logic, it may be serious according to my logic, that's...lng...and a...b-box.... Yeah and also according to your logic LNG and that box have a very serious relationship
|
|
|
Post by Happy on Sept 20, 2016 22:30:26 GMT -4
according to my logic, that's...lng...and a...b-box.... Yeah and also according to your logic LNG and that box have a very serious relationship Yes they do. Question regarding the drawing, have you suddenly transformed into Bebi? Because, like...yeah
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 20, 2016 22:42:44 GMT -4
Yeah and also according to your logic LNG and that box have a very serious relationship Yes they do. Question regarding the drawing, have you suddenly transformed into Bebi? Because, like...yeah I was Bebi all along.
|
|
|
Post by Happy on Sept 20, 2016 22:59:43 GMT -4
Yes they do. Question regarding the drawing, have you suddenly transformed into Bebi? Because, like...yeah I was Bebi all along. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoooE1one53[valu}e-=643ds='traitor--'
|
|
|
Post by Bannanachair on Sept 21, 2016 8:27:16 GMT -4
This is ridiculous if tim would appoint admins already one of those admins could lock this thread. Tim's not locking the thread because it's technically not breaking the rules. He can't lock a thread over petty arguments, unless the thread becomes personal with those involved in it and goes against the rules of Bannanachair. However, he could lock the thread were Happy himself to request it being locked. I never said that I'd lock a thread if the maker of the thread were to request it being locked (or if I did say that I don't know where/when I said it and I repeal that statement). If people respond to this thread that means that there's still a conversation going on and at least some people don't want the thread to die; if everyone ignores it and moves on because they want the thread to die then it will naturally sink to the bottom.
|
|
|
Post by Bannanachair on Sept 21, 2016 9:23:21 GMT -4
Ah, nevermind, you've convinced me. Consider this thread locked.
|
|