pewpew

[The Jiggler]

someone told me to make a poll to remove LNG from staff
idk if this should go in suggestions or nah 
but anyway
vote you skrubs

[gwebster2]

can i be staff

is there an option for making gwebster staff

click that one

[The Jiggler]

Sorry but there's an admissions fee, application fee, acceptance fee, and finally a training fee. And once you've finished training, you don't get paid.

Fees: 
Admission Fee - $17,000.95 
Application Fee - $8,480.48 
Acceptance Fee - $30,582.38
Training Fee - $1,582,952.72 

And to keep you in mind, you have to pay in Kuwait Dinars. The above amounts have already been translated from USD to KWD. 
USD: 
Admission Fee - $56,177.53
Application Fee - $28,022.69
Acceptance Fee - $101,055.68
Training Fee - $5,230,670.95

For a grand total of $1,639,016.53 in KWD and $5,415,926.85 in USD. 
I have over thirty million dollars on my credit card so I'm good.  

[LNG257]

Prec isn't part of the staff, so he wouldn't know.

If tim or duck think you're fit to be a member of the staff, you get to be a member of the staff. That's all there is to it.

[The Jiggler]

I was a member of staff before you ever were. 
If you didn't pay attention, I was the third member. 
I got kicked off for saying Singapore. 
Bitch. 

[LNG257]

I am neither female nor a dog, and note my use of the present tense. And yes, you were part of the staff once. A squire. And since you were removed from the staff, you have grown more and more immature and troll-ish.

[The Jiggler]

Just because of people like you and Purring sometimes. 
I like EVERYONE here except you two in a sense of a playful hatred. 
But SCREW LILY SHE SUCKS.

[LNG257]

And why is that? Because we have different opinions from you? Because we're active members of the staff who enforce the rules?

[gwebster2]

singapore?

is that
does singapore owe tim money?

[gwebster2]

lol i just noticed both options are yes

[The Jiggler]

Jul 28, 2015 19:15:37 GMT -4 LNG257 said:

And why is that? Because we have different opinions from you? Because we're active members of the staff who enforce the rules?

No because 
1.) You decided to ip-ban me for no reason. Almost got kicked off of staff for it.
2.) Purring censored something completely appropriate. 
3.) Purring wants to ip-ban me for no reason and follow in your footsteps.
4.) You think just because someone that isn't your superior, says to ban them, you follow through.
5.) You don't enforce the rules as well as you believe you do. You know when I was MiniMod? Yeah I did more moderating on those threads than you have done your entire career.
6.) Purring thought that calling someone N*gger is funny. 
7.) Pawz had to do your job. 
8.) You try to ban me for no justifiable reason as shown in the shoutbox prior to this thread. 

Shall I continue? 

[gwebster2]

i think i'd make great staff

[The Jiggler]

I made good staff until I said Singapore. 
I would still make a good staff member.
But for me to get on staff or be nice to a majority of the staff it'll demand Purring and LNG getting removed from their positions of power. Even if it's just demoting them to squires. 

[Deleted]

Jul 28, 2015 20:00:37 GMT -4 The Jiggler said:

Jul 28, 2015 19:15:37 GMT -4 LNG257 said:

And why is that? Because we have different opinions from you? Because we're active members of the staff who enforce the rules?

No because 
1.) You decided to ip-ban me for no reason. Almost got kicked off of staff for it.
2.) Purring censored something completely appropriate. 
3.) Purring wants to ip-ban me for no reason and follow in your footsteps.
4.) You think just because someone that isn't your superior, says to ban them, you follow through.
5.) You don't enforce the rules as well as you believe you do. You know when I was MiniMod? Yeah I did more moderating on those threads than you have done your entire career.
6.) Purring thought that calling someone N*gger is funny. 
7.) Pawz had to do your job. 
8.) You try to ban me for no justifiable reason as shown in the shoutbox prior to this thread. 

Shall I continue? 

You think I say racism is funny? I didn't know you'd resort to making stuff up.

TheMiniMod spammed stuff, and to be honest, it wasn't even a funny minimod. Just because you posted it publicly did NOT mean you were "moderating" at all- It just shapes you out to be a (think-you)know-it-all smart aleck. The reason you think the mods are so lazy is because half the time, the ugly posts are dealt with before you even get there to see it. You hardly see anything we mods do. 

You literally asked to be IP banned multiple times, albeit I was joking on that latest thread. 

You know what the reason was. 


These responses are out of order 
Figure it out yourself becauae it's not worth the effort of moving everytging. especially on a phone.

[Ivy]

Tim was in fault because he was being too paranoid about Birm mentioning the location of his country and because he used past offenses on ROBLOX as an excuse to ban WiFi. This is dealt with, though Birm deserves his position back.

Purring's ONLY fault was that she censored something completely appropriate. She was wise enough in all her decisions before and after that.

LNG did the right thing. He was in basically no fault.

Birm was in no fault, as mentioning Tim's country and implying he lived there was an accident. He was punished too harshly.

Prec has been pushing buttons for ages and deserves whatever punishment he receives.

EDIT:  Most of the other admins are dealing with this in a bit of a lax way, but kudos to Pawz and Duck for being the best admins we have, in my opinion.

[vammy]

Gwebster would be the best staff, Gweb-Gweb for staff-staff

[gwebster2]

i totally would be

whats the worse that could haaaapeeeenn?

[The Jiggler]

Wtf. 

IP-Banning someone is totally wrong. Even LNG said that he overstepped himself.
But me and him are cool. 

[Ivy]

Jul 29, 2015 12:14:43 GMT -4 The Jiggler said:

Wtf. 

IP-Banning someone is totally wrong. Even LNG said that he overstepped himself.
But me and him are cool. 

Other than that, then, I believe LNG has done nothing wrong.

Why tf are people asking for him to be removed?

[The Jiggler]

Idk.

Someone just told me to put this poll up so I did. :l 

[Ivy]

Jul 29, 2015 12:17:34 GMT -4 The Jiggler said:

Idk.

Someone just told me to put this poll up so I did. :l 

:l

[Death]

Jul 29, 2015 11:31:53 GMT -4 Ivy said:

Tim was in fault because he was being too paranoid about Birm mentioning the location of his country and because he used past offenses on ROBLOX as an excuse to ban WiFi. This is dealt with, though Birm deserves his position back.

Purring's ONLY fault was that she censored something completely appropriate. She was wise enough in all her decisions before and after that.

LNG did the right thing. He was in basically no fault.

Birm was in no fault, as mentioning Tim's country and implying he lived there was an accident. He was punished too harshly.

Prec has been pushing buttons for ages and deserves whatever punishment he receives.

EDIT:  Most of the other admins are dealing with this in a bit of a lax way, but kudos to Pawz and Duck for being the best admins we have, in my opinion.

I want to see both sides of the argument before punishment, as it's fair. Would that be considered a good admin?

[Ivy]

Jul 29, 2015 12:44:14 GMT -4 Death said:

Jul 29, 2015 11:31:53 GMT -4 Ivy said:

Tim was in fault because he was being too paranoid about Birm mentioning the location of his country and because he used past offenses on ROBLOX as an excuse to ban WiFi. This is dealt with, though Birm deserves his position back.

Purring's ONLY fault was that she censored something completely appropriate. She was wise enough in all her decisions before and after that.

LNG did the right thing. He was in basically no fault.

Birm was in no fault, as mentioning Tim's country and implying he lived there was an accident. He was punished too harshly.

Prec has been pushing buttons for ages and deserves whatever punishment he receives.

EDIT:  Most of the other admins are dealing with this in a bit of a lax way, but kudos to Pawz and Duck for being the best admins we have, in my opinion.

I want to see both sides of the argument before punishment, as it's fair. Would that be considered a good admin?

Yes, but I didn't really see you doing anything.  No offense of course.  :l

[Death]

Jul 29, 2015 12:47:25 GMT -4 Ivy said:

Jul 29, 2015 12:44:14 GMT -4 Death said:

I want to see both sides of the argument before punishment, as it's fair. Would that be considered a good admin?

Yes, but I didn't really see you doing anything.  No offense of course.  :l

None taken, but I dealt with roxy being a troll and I went to see what Prec had to say for himself.

[Ivy]

Jul 29, 2015 12:50:22 GMT -4 Death said:

Jul 29, 2015 12:47:25 GMT -4 Ivy said:

Yes, but I didn't really see you doing anything.  No offense of course.  :l

None taken, but I dealt with roxy being a troll and I went to see what Prec had to say for himself.

That's good, but you still didn't really take any action.  You're a good admin in any other instances though, I guess.